Largest Dutch pension fund suddenly loses trust in climate policies of fossil fuel companies

NEWSLETTER

Stay informed and get our monthly newsletter delivered to your inbox.

PRESS RELEASE 

ABP to divest from fossil fuels within 1.5 years

In an abrupt U-turn, pension fund ABP (asset manager: APG) announced plans to sell all assets in fossil fuel companies within 1.5 years (€15 billion, 3% of total assets). With this unexpected turn of events, Shell loses one of its biggest supporters in the Netherlands. At Shell’s AGM in May, ABP voted in favour of Shell’s own climate strategy; under this plan, Shell’s emissions would increase over the next decade. In the case of the Follow This climate resolution, which requested Paris-consistent targets, ABP abstained. Out of ten largest investors in the Netherlands, Robeco is the last one backing Shell.

“Today, Shell loses one of their best friends. We hope this is a wake-up call for the board of Shell,” responds Mark van Baal of Follow This.

“Apparently, Follow This has more trust in Shell than ABP. Follow This, along with investors who vote for our climate resolutions, believe that the fossil fuel industry can drive the energy transition to achieve the goal of the Paris Accord.”

“We hope more critical investors will replace ABP as shareholders in Big Oil.”

Fossil-free movement
“This is a victory for the fossil-free movement and a victory for the fight against the climate crisis. It shows how a group of citizens can make an impact.”

Legal risk: liability
“Risk of liability could have played a role in this abrupt decision. In 2021, a Dutch court ordered Shell to severely reduce their emissions by 2030. This foreshadows a new wave of litigation against major GHG emitters, and indicates that oil majors and large investors have an individual responsibility to combat climate change,” said McKenzie Ursch, legal adviser for Follow This.

Argument ABP: insufficient opportunity to push
ABP chair Corien Wortmann-Kool in the press release: “We part with our investments in fossil fuel producers because we see insufficient opportunity for us as a shareholder to push for the necessary, significant acceleration of the energy transition at these companies.”

Van Baal: “ABP did not use its power as one of the world’s largest pension funds to its full extent: they did not once vote for our climate resolutions. In May, ABP voted in favour of Shell’s in-house climate resolution. Until today, Shell could claim to have the support of ABP.”

 

SHARE POST

BP's board faced a triple climate rebellion at its AGM. Shareholders rejected plans to weaken climate disclosures, and 18% opposed chair Albert Manifold's re-election.
BP faces an unprecedented shareholder revolt over climate policy, after the Follow This resolution was barred from the agenda
Incoming CEO Meg O'Neill faces immediate pressure as Follow This demands a strategy for the inevitable decline in fossil fuel demand at BP.
Exxon sued us in 2024. BP is blocking us now. We're not stopping

Follow us