Big Oil’s winning streak forces activist investors to regroup

After months of tensions, shareholder activists will confront ExxonMobil and Chevron at their annual meetings to demand stronger climate targets.
NEWSLETTER

Stay informed and get our monthly newsletter delivered to your inbox.

New York Times | Months of tensions between oil majors and activist investors could reach a boiling point at the annual meetings of Exxon Mobil and Chevron Wednesday, as the U.S. giants pump record levels of crude and sit on bumper profits.

Activists’ efforts to pressure Big Oil to clean up its polluting ways are faltering. Last week, climate change protests rocked Shell’s annual meeting in London. But the company easily saw off a measure filed by Follow This, a Dutch shareholder activist group, and other investors, demanding that the oil giant drastically strengthen its climate targets.

Exxon could face an even fiercer battle this week — not only with the activist investors it is suing, but from powerful institutional investors as well. They include Norway’s huge sovereign wealth fund, and CalPERS, the California pension fund, both of which strongly oppose Exxon’s attempt to quiet some of its most vocal climate critics.

A recap: In January, Exxon sued two activist investor groups, Arjuna Capital and Follow This, in a Texas court, saying that their resolution to include so-called Scope 3 emissions targets reflected “an extreme agenda” that was detrimental to shareholders.

The groups withdrew their resolution, fearing that an Exxon legal win could essentially silence all activists and shareholder debates. Last week, a Texas judge ruled that Exxon’s lawsuit could proceed against Arjuna, which is based in Massachusetts, but said that the court had no jurisdiction over Follow This, which is based in Amsterdam. Exxon is still suing.

[…]

One new idea: up the pressure on Wall Street. “In general, we should focus far more on investors” than on oil majors that “just don’t want to change,” Mark van Baal, the founder of Follow This, told DealBook. He said that winning over pension funds and firms like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, which have significant stakes in oil companies, would give the activists more clout.

[…]

Another complication: Van Baal said that big investment firms preferred having a private dialogue with oil companies about the climate crisis, rather than backing activist resolutions. “The oil industry has done an excellent job of convincing investors that they have to choose between climate and profits,” he said.

Read the full story on New York Times

 

SHARE POST

BP's board faced a triple climate rebellion at its AGM. Shareholders rejected plans to weaken climate disclosures, and 18% opposed chair Albert Manifold's re-election.
BP faces an unprecedented shareholder revolt over climate policy, after the Follow This resolution was barred from the agenda
Incoming CEO Meg O'Neill faces immediate pressure as Follow This demands a strategy for the inevitable decline in fossil fuel demand at BP.
Exxon sued us in 2024. BP is blocking us now. We're not stopping

Follow us