The truth about big oil and climate change

NEWSLETTER

Stay informed and get our monthly newsletter delivered to your inbox.

The Economist | 9 February 2019

Shell, under pressure of green investors, said it would tie executive pay to a plan to cut carbon emissions from its products.

This year shareholders will vote on a resolution to require ExxonMobil to do what Shell has done and commit to reducing emissions not just from its operations but also from the products it sells.

Even if shareholders vote in favour of the resolution, ExxonMobil, like Shell, would probably have an escape hatch. Shell can increase production of oil and gas under its new targets, as long as it takes other steps such as increasing energy production from wind and solar. Shell also may adjust its targets, to keep its plans consistent with society’s progress towards the goals of the Paris treaty. If governments do not restrict carbon emissions, Shell can ease up too.

Read the entire briefing in The Economist this week

SHARE POST

Follow This secured 21 percent support from independent shareholders at Equinor’s AGM for a proposal demanding disclosure on strategy under declining oil and gas demand.
BP's board faced a triple climate rebellion at its AGM. Shareholders rejected plans to weaken climate disclosures, and 18% opposed chair Albert Manifold's re-election.
BP faces an unprecedented shareholder revolt over climate policy, after the Follow This resolution was barred from the agenda
Exxon sued us in 2024. BP is blocking us now. We're not stopping

Follow us