BP governance crisis and the energy transition deadlock

BP ousted its chair after shareholders revolted over a blocked Follow This resolution, exposing deep governance failures at the oil major.
NEWSLETTER

Stay informed and get our monthly newsletter delivered to your inbox.

CNBC | “Blocking a resolution was just a symptom of a much huger problem, which is a governance issue” says Mark van Baal on CNBC.  “BP’s governance is broken. The board of BP doesn’t talk to shareholders anymore. And that’s a problem which already exists for over a year.”

At the last AGM, BP shareholders punished chair Manifold for blocking a Follow This resolution by voting down two board resolutions by more than 50%, with 18% voting against him. “He was an incoming chair. It was not even his re election, it was his election and he got 18%. So that was extremely embarrassing,” says Van Baal. “BP chose to remove Manifold rather than reform its governance.”

On the broader failure of oil majors to invest in clean energy: “They all invested around 10% in clean energy, 90% still to fossil fuels. Then you can’t say you’re in a transition.”

Van Baal points to structural demand drop-off ahead: “We’re looking at the structural decline as of 2029. Then peak oil will happen according to the IEA. Then demand for oil and gas will go down. And they’re not prepared for it.”

SHARE POST

BP ousted chair Albert Manifold over governance issues, months after he blocked a climate resolution by Follow This.
Follow This secured 21 percent support from independent shareholders at Equinor’s AGM for a proposal demanding disclosure on strategy under declining oil and gas demand.
BP's board faced a triple climate rebellion at its AGM. Shareholders rejected plans to weaken climate disclosures, and 18% opposed chair Albert Manifold's re-election.
Exxon sued us in 2024. BP is blocking us now. We're not stopping

Follow us